Let us discuss about two different models around, the one is western capitalism and the other is eastern communism.
The "Capitalism" is inspired from the Big-Bang model as proposed by the physicists. Where one capitalist inflates the entire system in a "space-time" which we call "Market"! The relation is "One" to "many" in such model.
The idea of communism is derived from the principle of relativity or the relative model of world, which states that the entire existence is polarised and is established on two opposite poles. In communism or socialism the relation is "one" to "one", and the two opposite poles are Rich and the Poor...!!! This model can be compared with a circular disc which is half black and half white...!!! But the disc must keep on revolving to stimulate the system... providing the essential energy required keeping the system working.
Both the above systems are dead ones and can not work without the human intervention.
We should be having a "Live" system, which call as "Nationalism". This system is based on the "Singularity", which is the origin of the world and the ultimate destination of universe. Singularity is timeless and space less and hence "UNIFORM", without the opposite poles. Nobody is "Rich" in this system because there is no "Poor". There is no relation (Social/Economic or religious), that is why this system is not based on the model of "Creation" but on the model of "Before Creation / After Destruction" i.e. "Singularity". If there are no ownerships on LAND, this system will start working automatically. Land should be free for use. We need to deflate the current system before it explodes and hurt many, and the idea is very simple, just remove the price tags from the LAND. Because LAND is source for the natural resources and sources are not evaluated but the resources are.
Well explained Vikas, I wanna tell Anonymous that Gandhi's saying and teachings are irrelevent here. To prove one's celibacy (abstention from sexual intercourse - in his case) one doesn't need to sleep with girls to prove that he is not aroused( as written in his biography).If a man is saint, he should not be a politician because that messes everything. Let him remain a so called saint. I think now you understand what I am trying to say here if you are wise enough. If you still have doubts then you can contact either of us.